Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

All Day I Dream About Opposition Proceedings

While it looks like there might not be much Ryder Cup drama this year, there has been no lack of golf-related drama in recent years. Much of the drama has related to the fledgling LIV Golf tour, which now finds itself in a new dispute.

This time, it is with Adidas, which recently initiated an opposition proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office seeking to prevent LIV from registering its logo:

Picture of the Ryder Cup logo
In its Notice of Opposition, Adidas argues that it has been using a similar three-striped mark for decades and that if LIV were allowed to register its logo as a trademark it would cause confusion between the two companies.

That is all good and well, but you may be asking, “What is an opposition proceeding?” Let me explain.

After a trademark application is filed, the application is reviewed by an Examining Attorney that works at the USPTO. If the application is approved, then it is published for opposition. Once an application is published for opposition, there is a 30-day window for any party that thinks it may be harmed by registration of the applied for trademark to oppose registration or seek an extension of time to oppose registration.

If a party chooses to oppose, it must file a Notice of Opposition providing the grounds for opposition. If a party files a Notice of Opposition, it triggers an opposition proceeding, which is an administrative proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Opposition proceedings look a lot like other legal proceedings, including a pleading phase, discovery phase, and trial phase. They can be long and, sometimes, expensive. Indeed, the schedule for the Adidas / LIV opposition proceeding currently runs until March 2025. Feel free to start taking bets over whether the PGA / LIV merger will be complete before the conclusion of the opposition proceeding.

In any event, all brand owners should be aware of opposition proceedings. As a trademark applicant, brand owners must understand that – even if an Examining Attorney approves a trademark application – there is still a risk that a third party will oppose registration of the trademark. As a trademark owner, brand owners also should consider monitoring the trademark office to determine if there are any applications that are approved that may need to be opposed.

Fortunately, most trademark firms, like Trust Tree, offer trademark monitoring services as well as a variety of opposition-related services.

Check Out Our Trademark Services

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn